Contact Us

+350 20079000

This data will only be used by Hassans for processing your query and for no other purpose. View our privacy policy
| 2 minutes read

To know CRS is to love CRS... not really

There are some moments in your life as a lawyer when a lightbulb goes on above your head and you think "Hold On?". This paper that I co-authored with Harriet Brown of Old Square Tax Chambers in London and which was published by European Taxation recently, was born from one of those moments. 

So, I'm sat there at my desk mid-Covid pandemic and I'm burrowing into the CRS regulations worrying about this weird definition of "Financial Account", and I suddenly notice this odd sentence:

"in the case of a Financial Institution not described in subparagraph C (1) (a), any equity or debt interest in the Financial Institution, if the class of interests was established with the purpose of avoiding reporting in accordance with Section I."

Well...that's odd. 

There's a purpose test tucked away there. Well what does that mean? 

So, I went to check the Commentary. The Commentary explicitly agrees with this and goes further and carves out the "managed by entity".

This is all technical stuff, and all very fascinating for us tax wonks, but the point is that there was an inconsistency in what things said and how things are done. So, it bothered me. The best way to think things through is to write it down. As my good friend a philosophy professor at Oxford once said "writing is thinking". We need to write to crystallise our thoughts. So I wrote, and once you've done that writing you may as well submit it to be published. Why not? Whats the worst that can happen? And some journals pay you.

The article itself brings up some serious issues, if financial institutions have been overreporting they are open to action under #GDPR, and if that overreporting arises from errors and confusion in the guidance and commentary then any fiduciary or other reporting entity which makes a report which ignores the "Purpose test" i noticed may well find themselves open to action.

You can read my article here

This uncertainty about the definition of “financial account” may encourage over-reporting, which could have serious repercussions for both clients and financial institutions.

Top-ranked in all practice areas in Legal 500 EMEA 2024

Hassans is pleased to announce that it has once again achieved top tier rankings in all areas covered by Legal 500 EMEA for Gibraltar....

Posted on
Read more

Latest Insights

Upcoming compulsory pensions deadlines for Medium, Small and Micro companies

As many employers will be aware, following the enactment of the Private Sector Pensions Act 2019 (“the Act”), which came into force in...

Posted on
Read more

Ethical Gambling Forum 2024

The Ethical Gambling Forum 2024 was held at the Sunborn Hotel, Gibraltar, last week attended by gambling operators and service providers...

Posted on
Read more

Insurance and Reinsurance Comparative Guide

Hassans' Head of Insurance Yvonne Chu has contributed to Lexology's most recent Panoramic Guide relating to Insurance and Reinsurance. ...

Posted on
Read more