Contact Us

+350 20079000 info@hassans.gi

This data will only be used by Hassans for processing your query and for no other purpose. View our privacy policy
| 1 minute read

Facebook’s past privacy practices fail under regulatory scrutiny

The consensus among data security professionals is that a security breach is not a matter of if, but a matter of when.

Breaches lead to regulatory attention and even slickest operations can be undone under scrutiny. This scrutiny can expose holes or lapses in a business’ privacy practices (whether these lapses are flagrant rule violations or simply unintentional).

On Tuesday, the Irish Data Protection Commission issued Facebook’s parent company (Meta Platforms) with a fine of €17 million for a series of security lapses that occurred in violation of GDPR laws. The fine stems from a security-related inquiry opened by the DPC following 12 data breach notifications received from Facebook in the period between 7 June 2018 and 4 December 2018. This follows a €225 million fine issued in September 2021 for another GDPR violation in connection with a DPC investigation into security issues in Meta's WhatsApp communication service. 

In reaction to Tuesday's developments, Meta shared a statement in which it claimed that “this fine is about record keeping practices from 2018 that we have since updated, not a failure to protect people's information”.

Notwithstanding Meta’s assertion that it did not risk exposing users’ data, there remains an inevitability to cyber threats and data breaches. These risks emphasise the importance of not only maintaining up-to-date policies which meet privacy laws and protect against the latest threats, but of ensuring that a business is capable of demonstrating that its compliance is correctly evidenced in the event of third-party scrutiny.

The DPC found that Meta Platforms failed to have in place appropriate technical and organisational measures which would enable it to readily demonstrate the security measures that it implemented in practice to protect EU users’ data, in the context of the twelve personal data breaches. www.dataprotection.ie/...

Gibraltar Opens the Door to Tokenised Fund Shares: What It Means and Who Can Use It

DLT now sits inside Gibraltar's statutory framework for investment funds, a step most jurisdictions have discussed without legislating...

Posted on
Read more

Latest Insights

Why Gibraltar for Investment Funds? EIFs, Protected Cells and the New Tokenisation Regime.

Choosing the right jurisdiction for an investment fund involves more than comparing regulatory requirements. Fund managers increasingly...

Posted on
Read more

Digital Trade Finance: Why Gibraltar?

A container can reach its destination before the paper bill of lading does, leaving cargo waiting, payment delayed and working capital...

Posted on
Read more

Aaron Payas’ Funds Europe opinion piece on tokenised shares in Experience Investor Funds

Gibraltar has further cemented its position at the forefront of financial innovation with new legislation permitting tokenised shares in...

Posted on
Read more